The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte RICHARD PAUL TARQUINI AND GEORGE SIMON GALES ____________________ Appeal 2007-1276 Application 10/001,4461 Technology Center 2100 ____________________ Decided: July 30, 2007 ____________________ Before ALLEN R. MACDONALD, JAY P. LUCAS, and SCOTT R. BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judges. BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final rejection of claims 1-10, all the claims pending in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm-in-part. 1 Application filed October 31, 2001. The real party in interest is Hewlett- Packard Development Company, L.P.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013