1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte PASQUALE A. PATULLO and THOMAS L. TROTTA
12 ___________
13
14 Appeal 2007-1315
15 Application 09/828,437
16 Technology Center 3600
17 ___________
18
19 Decided: July 3, 2007
20 ___________
21
22 Before JENNIFER D. BAHR, STUART S. LEVY, and ANTON W. FETTING,
22 Administrative Patent Judges.
23
24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
25
26 DECISION ON APPEAL
27
28
29 STATEMENT OF CASE
30 This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-28, the only claims
31 pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have jurisdiction
32 over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
33
34 We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013