Appeal 2007-1325 Application 10/065,722 1 The following prior art was relied upon by the Examiner. 2 3 Name Patent Number Issue Date 4 Waterbury US 4,232,797 Nov. 11, 1980 5 Freek US 5,996,837 Dec. 07, 1999 6 7 In addition to the prior art cited by the Examiner, we also refer to the 8 following additional prior art. 9 10 Name Patent Number Issue Date 11 DeMars US 4,899,902 Feb. 13, 1990 12 Mueller US 5,415,312 May 16, 1995 13 Lane US 5,490,609 Feb. 13, 1996 14 Aichert FR 2 736 620 Jan. 17, 1997 15 All prior art cited above is prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). 16 17 B. Record on appeal 18 In deciding this appeal, we have considered only the following 19 documents: 20 1. Specification, including original claims. 21 2. Drawings. 22 3. Office Action entered 26 January 2006 23 4. Notice of Appeals filed 24 April 2004. 24 5. The Appeal Brief filed 26 June 2006. 25 6. The Examiner’s Answer entered 26 October 2006. 26 7. Freek. 27 8. Waterbury. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013