The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT J. QUINT
____________
Appeal 2007-2337
Application 10/437,919
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 21, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 11-15, and 17-24. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6.
The Appellant’s claimed invention relates to urethane elastomer
compositions. According to the Appellant, the urethane compositions have
reduced thermoplasticity, significantly increased tear strength, significantly
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013