The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte MOTOAKI KATAOKA, TOSHIKI MATSUMOTO, TSUTOMU TASHIRO, MAMORU MABUCHI, and MAMORU SAWADA ________________ Appeal 2007-1367 Application 10/703,596 Technology Center 3600 ________________ Decided: June 28, 2007 ________________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-8. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. A vehicle vibration control apparatus for controlling an engine and/or brake in response to an input indicative of at least one of the driver’s operations of an accelerator, steering and brake, comprising:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013