Ex Parte Kataoka et al - Page 1



                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                  
                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                ________________                                                       
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                ________________                                                       
                         Ex parte MOTOAKI KATAOKA, TOSHIKI MATSUMOTO,                                                  
                                TSUTOMU TASHIRO, MAMORU MABUCHI,                                                       
                                            and MAMORU SAWADA                                                          
                                                ________________                                                       
                                                 Appeal 2007-1367                                                      
                                              Application 10/703,596                                                   
                                              Technology Center 3600                                                   
                                                ________________                                                       
                                              Decided:  June 28, 2007                                                  
                                                ________________                                                       
                 Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                         
                 CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
                 KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-8.  Claim 1 is                          
                 illustrative:                                                                                         
                 1. A vehicle vibration control apparatus for controlling an engine and/or                             
                 brake in response to an input indicative of at least one of the driver’s                              
                 operations of an accelerator, steering and brake, comprising:                                         

                                                                                                                      



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013