Ex Parte Jackson et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                         Ex parte JOHN R. JACKSON                                                  
                                                      AND                                                          
                                            MINGCHUAN ZHAO                                                         
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2007-1368                                                    
                                            Application 10/601,602                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                            Decided:  April 30, 2007                                               
                                                 ____________                                                      
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and CATHERINE Q.                                            
                TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8-17, 34, and 35.                      
                Claims 8 and 34 are illustrative:                                                                  
                       8.  An assembly for the continuous, cyclic production of an alkali                          
                metal halate comprising an electrolytic cell, a gas and liquid disengager for a                    
                catholyte stream, and a gas and liquid disengager for an anolyte stream, said                      
                electrolytic cell comprising a low alkali metal ion transport efficiency                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013