The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD M. GIBSON, WILLIS D. CAMPBELL, JR.,
ALBERT E. JOHNSON, KENNETH P. WALLACE,
and ALLEN J. HAWKS
____________
Appeal 2007-1374
Application 10/701,714
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: June 14, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 1, 3-8, and 10-18. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013