Ex Parte Gibson et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                     Ex parte RICHARD M. GIBSON, WILLIS D. CAMPBELL, JR.,                                   
                           ALBERT E. JOHNSON, KENNETH P. WALLACE,                                           
                                          and ALLEN J. HAWKS                                                
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1374                                                
                                          Application 10/701,714                                            
                                          Technology Center 1700                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                                          Decided:  June 14, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  
               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and                                              
               CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                        
               decision rejecting claims 1, 3-8, and 10-18.  We have jurisdiction under                     
               35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                            
                      We AFFIRM.                                                                            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013