Appeal 2007-1376
Application 10/677,870
to the recited amount of elastic deformation, which would serve to rebut the
inference of obviousness established by the Examiner.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by
the Examiner, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
clj
Crowell & Moring LLP
Intellectual Property Group
P.O. Box 14300
Washington, DC 20044-4300
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013