Ex Parte Hernandez - Page 4

               Appeal 2007-1381                                                                          
               Application 10/686,069                                                                    
                        6. During the winding process of Von Hoessle, the fiber-optic                    
                           waveguide is provided with a binding agent.  The binding agent                
                           contains a volatile solvent that is removed during drying (Von                
                           Hoessle, col. 1, ll. 22-26).                                                  
                        7. The coil support of Von Hoessle is made from a porous                         
                           ceramic.  The pores allow diffusion of the solvent through the                
                           support during drying (Von Hoessle, col. 2, ll. 17-31).                       
                        8. Pauley is directed to a sizing agent for use on various substrates            
                           including paperboard (Abstract).  The sizing agent imparts                    
                           water resistance, but allows the substrate to breathe (Pauley,                
                           col. 1, ll. 7-9; col. 4, ll. 23-25 and 31-36; col. 6, ll. 40-43).             
                        9. The substrates treated with the sizing agent of Pauley are                    
                           imparted with stain resistance to aqueous fluids (Pauley, col. 6,             
                           ll. 54-56).                                                                   
                     C.  Principles of Law                                                               
                     The examiner bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case              
               of obviousness.  In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444                 
               (Fed. Cir. 1992).  In order to establish a prima facie case of obviousness, the           
               examiner must show that each and every limitation of the claim is described               
               or suggested by the prior art or would have been obvious based on the                     
               knowledge of those of ordinary skill in the art.  In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071,              
               1074, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988).                                               
                     D.  Analysis                                                                        
                     In the present case, the Examiner has not established that it would                 
               have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of making glass forming             
               tubes to eliminate the silicone release coating conventionally used on the                

                                                   4                                                     

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013