Appeal 2007-1384
Application 10/122,683
In light of the foregoing, it is our ultimate determination that the
evidence as a whole in the record before us weighs most heavily in favor of
an obviousness conclusion. We hereby sustain, therefore, the § 103
rejection of all appealed claims as being unpatentable over Mayer in view of
Fitterman.
The decision of the Examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
clj
Sherrill Law Offices
4756 Banning Ave.
Suite 212
White Bear Lake, MN 55110-3205
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013