The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte ANAND KRISHNAMURTHY, MUTHU VENKATESH
MUTHURAJ, BENJAMIN D. NOVATZKY, and
STEVEN LAWRENCE FORS
___________
Appeal 2007-1414
Application 10/453,559
Technology Center 2600
___________
Decided: July 26, 2007
___________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1-3, 5-8, 16-18, 20-23, and 53-86. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013