Appeal 2007-1417
Application 09/877,536
and their relation to a privacy policy and Curbow provides the teachings for
the manipulation of the data elements and the document they consequently
create." (Final Office Action mailed January 19, 2006, at 9-10.)
We have considered Appellants' remaining arguments and find them
unpersuasive. Accordingly, we conclude that the Examiner did not err in
rejecting claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
Claims 2-31 were not argued separately, and fall together with
claim 1.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude that
the Examiner did not err in rejecting claims 1-31. The rejection of those
claims is affirmed.
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1-31 for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
affirmed.
17
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013