Appeal 2007-1447
Application 10/214,588
Appellant invented a display apparatus for displaying document
contents described in a markup language received from a remote server.
(Specification 1.)
Claim 1 is illustrative and representative of the claimed invention. It
reads as follows:
1. A document display apparatus for receiving documents described
in a markup language from a server connected through a network and
displaying the documents, comprising:
a first receiving system that receives a description file defining a
plurality of pages forming the documents;
a second receiving system that receives, from the server, at least one
first separate file comprising at least one of characters, images, and sounds
defined by an initial display page of the received description file;
a first display system that analyzes the initial display page of the
received description file and displays the initial display page by using the at
least one first separate file; and
a third receiving system that receives, from the server, at least one
second separate file comprising at lest one of characters, images, and sounds
defined by a second page of the description file, after the second receiving
system receives all of the first separate files.
In rejecting the claims on appeal, the Examiner relied upon the
following prior art:
Mighdoll US 6,311,197 B2 Oct. 30, 2001
The Examiner rejected the claims on appeal as follows:
Claims 1 through 3 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as
being anticipated by Mighdoll.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013