The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MATTHIAS MULLER and GUNTER BAUER
____________
Appeal 2007-1448
Application 10/601,325
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: June 26, 2007
____________
Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
HUBERT C. LORIN, and JOSEPH A. FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.
FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-7, and 11-13. Claims 9 and 10 are withdrawn from
consideration. Claims 8, 14-19 have been cancelled. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013