Appeal 2007-1454
Application 11/088,528
1 CONCLUSION
2 The rejection of claims 1-48 on enablement grounds is not sustained. The
3 rejection of claims 1, 2, 6-11, 14, 18-22, 25, 26, 30-35, 38, and 42-26 under 35
4 U.S.C. § 102(b) is not sustained. The obviousness rejection of claims 12, 13, 23,
5 24, 36, 37, 47, and 48 is also not sustained. The provisional double patenting
6 rejection has been summarily affirmed.
7
8 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
9 appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
10 AFFIRMED-IN-PART
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 hh
29
29 ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS, LLC
30
30 986 BEDFORD STREET
31
32 STAMFORD, CT 06905-5619
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013