UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DAVID FARCOT, JEAN-FRANCOIS GONTHIER, and HENRI RANCON __________ Appeal No. 2007-1463 Application No. 10/083,492 Technology Center 3600 __________ Decided: September 24, 2007 __________ Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, HUBERT C. LORIN, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 16-18, 23-25, 28-30, 35-38, 40, and 41.1 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (b) (2002). 1 Claims 5, 8, 11, 15, 19, 21, 22, 26, 27, and 31-34 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter, but are objected to for depending upon rejected claims. Final Rejection, mailed Oct. 16, 2003, p. 1.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013