Appeal 2007-1469
Application 10/035,579
On the record before us, it follows that the Examiner erred in rejecting
claim 1 under § 103(a). Since claims 2-37 are analogous or narrower than
claim 1, it also follows that those claims were not properly rejected under
§ 103(a) over Lynch.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
(1) Appellant has established that the Examiner erred in rejecting
claims 1-37 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Lynch.
(2) On this record, claims 1-37 have not been shown to be
unpatentable.
DECISION
The Examiner's rejection of claims 1-37 is Reversed.
REVERSED
KIS
SUN MICROSYSTEMS/FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, L.L.P.
901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013