The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SCOTT G. WALTON, DARRIN LEONHARDT, ROBERT A. MEGER, RICHARD FERNSLER AND CHRISTORPHER MURATORE ____________ Appeal 2007-1470 Application 10/644,567 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 25, 2007 ____________ Before BRADLEY T. GARRIS, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER We remand the above identified application to the Examiner for action consistent with our comments below. The Appellants' Brief filed January 23, 2006 includes an Evidence Appendix which contains two pieces of evidence, namely, (1) a graph ofPage: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013