The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte NEAL RICHARD MARION, GEORGE F. RAMSAY III,
and JAMES STANLEY TESAURO
__________
Appeal 2007-1471
Application 10/402,110
Technology Center 2600
__________
Decided: August 7, 2007
__________
Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
We note that Appellants have introduced a new argument in the Reply
Brief. Specifically, Appellants argue that the Aschenbrenner reference (U.S.
Pat. 5,406,310) does not disclose the recited limitation “wherein dynamic
sizing of color tables occurs” (See independent claims 1, 8, and 14; see also
Reply Brief 3).
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013