The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte TIMOTHY M. SCHMIDL, ANAND G. DABAK,
MOHAMMED NAFIE, and ALAN GATHERER
____________________
Appeal 2007-1481
Application 09/915,0911
Technology Center 2600
____________________
Decided: August 6, 2007
____________________
Before: JOSEPH L. DIXON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and MARC
S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1-3 and 5-322. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 Application filed July 25, 2001. The application claims priority under 35
U.S.C. § 119(e) from Provisional Application No. 60/231,652, filed
September 11, 2000. The real party in interest is Texas Instruments, Inc.
2 Claim 4 has been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013