Ex Parte Mueller et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                       Ex parte KLAUS MUELLER                                               
                                          and KLAUS KLEMM                                                   
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1482                                                
                                          Application 10/484,149                                            
                                         Technology Center 1700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 23, 2007                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE                                      
               Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-10, and                   
               15-21.  Claims 11-14 stand withdrawn from consideration.  Claim 1 is                         
               illustrative:                                                                                
                      1.  A layered composite material, which encompasses at least                          
                      a)  a polyolefin back layer,                                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013