The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________________ Ex parte RONALD E. GILLINGHAM, MICHAEL M. FILIPOVICH, ROBERT ARMITAGE and JOSEPH B. FRENCH __________________ Appeal 2007-1490 Application 10/707,4841 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: June 12, 2007 ________________ Before JAMESON LEE, ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, and SALLY C. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1 A. Statement of the Case 2 Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of 3 claims 11, 12, and 14-21. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). 1 Application for patent filed 17 December 2003. The real party in interest is Ford Global Technologies, LLC.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013