Ex Parte Kouznetsov et al - Page 1

                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                    Ex parte VICTOR KOUZNETSOV, DAVIDE LIBENZI, MARTIN                                       
                     FALLENSTEDT, DAVID W. PALMER, and MICHAEL C. PAK                                        
                                             Appeal 2007-1499                                                
                                          Application 10/122,095                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                       Decided: September 20, 2007                                           
                Before ALLEN R. MACDONALD, JEAN R. HOMERE, and MARC S.                                       
                HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                              ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER                                                
                      This is a remand of the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                          
                rejection of claims 1-31, in accordance with 37 C.F.R.  41.50(a)(1).  After                 
                considering the record before us, we are convinced that the instant appeal is                
                not ready for meaningful review.  Accordingly, we hereby remand the                          
                application to the Examiner to consider the following issues, and to take                    
                appropriate action.                                                                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013