Ex Parte Fernandes et al - Page 3

               Appeal 2007-1519                                                                            
               Application 10/177,837                                                                      

               the date when the Examiner retrieved the definitions from the Internet are                  
               missing from her citations.  Because of these omissions, "[t]he appeal is                   
               manifestly not ready for a decision on the merits."  Ex parte Braeken,                      
               54 USPQ2d 1110, 1112 (BPAI 1999).                                                           

                                               IV. ORDER                                                   
               For the aforementioned reasons, we remand the application to the                            
               Examiner to furnish a copy of the aforementioned definitions, to cite the                   
               definitions in the Evidence Relied Upon section of her Answer, to add the                   
               date of publication and the date of retrieval to her citations thereof, and for             
               any further action not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.                        

                      Any subsequent Answer must be self-contained with respect to all                     
               rejections and arguments; no prior Answer or Office action may be                           
               referenced or incorporated therein.  Similarly, although furnishing the                     
               definition does not necessitate a new Brief, any subsequent Brief submitted                 
               by the Appellant must be self-contained with respect to all arguments.  No                  
               prior Brief may be referenced or incorporated therein.                                      

                      Because it is being remanded for further action, the application is a                
               "special" application.  MPEP § 708.01(D).  Accordingly, it requires                         
               immediate action.  Furthermore, the Board should be informed promptly of                    
               any action affecting status of the appeal (e.g., abandonment, issue, reopening              
               prosecution).                                                                               



                                                    3                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013