Ex Parte Oberthur - Page 5

                Appeal 2007-1521                                                                                   
                Application 10/694,584                                                                             
                15.    Groups R1 through R7 are defined in relevant part4 as:                                      
                       R1 represents * * * a C7-C40-alkylaryl group * * *                                          
                       R2 to R5 are the same or different and stand for hydrogen,                                  
                              * * * a C1-C20-alkyl group, * * *.                                                   
                16. According to Becke, the catalysts are "preferably suitable for the                             
                preparation of rubbers based on copolymers of ethylene with one or more of                         
                the α-olefins and dienes mentioned."  (Becke at 8:4–7.)                                            
                17. Becke provides several examples of polymerizations using the                                   
                catalysts that lead to rubbers, e.g., Examples 2, 3, 8, and 9.                                     
                18. None of Becke's examples use a complex based on a monoazadiene                                 
                within the scope of Oberthur's formula (I).                                                        
                       Examiner's rejection                                                                        
                19. The Examiner finds that "Becke teaches a method for admixing an                                
                anti-aging agent, monoazadiene, with at least one rubber monomer,                                  
                particularly conjugated dienes, and a vulcanizing agent, Vulkanox BKF."                            
                (Answer at 3, citing Becke at 7:26 through 8:40, and 11:45.)                                       
                20. The Examiner maintains further that the preamble should not be given                           
                patentable weight "because properties with respect to aging characteristics                        
                are absent in the body of the claims."  (Answer at 3.)                                             
                       Oberthur's Argument                                                                         
                21. Oberthur argues claims 1, 2, and 4 as standing or falling together, and                        
                presents a nominally separate argument that claims 5 and 6 stand or fall                           
                together.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                  
                4 The complete definition is reproduced in Appendix II.                                            

                                                        5                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013