Ex Parte Ellingsen et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                   
                                          precedent of the Board.                                             

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                        Ex parte JAN EIRIK ELLINGSEN and GUNNAR ROLLA                                         
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1526                                                 
                                          Application 11/035,534                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided:  June 29, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                Before PETER F. KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and                                                  
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of                  
                claims 5-7, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 79-87.1  We have jurisdiction pursuant to                     
                35 U.S.C. § 6.                                                                                
                      The subject application for a patent presents an invention directed to a                
                process of treating a metallic bone implant with a hydrofluoric acid solution.                
                                                                                                             
                1 An oral hearing was held on June 06, 2007.  Counsel for Appellants                          
                appeared via telephone.                                                                       



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013