Ex Parte Cang et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    



                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ___________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ___________                                                   
                               Ex parte YONGMEI CANG AND SHU LIN                                             
                                               ___________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1537                                                
                                          Application 09/916,903                                             
                                          Technology Center 2600                                             
                                               ___________                                                   
                                       Decided: September 17, 2007                                           
                                               ___________                                                   

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and                                                 
                ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013