Ex Parte Bratek et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
              Ex parte DANIEL J. BRATEK, PHILIP KANG, ROBERT C. KOSBERG, and                                
                                          JAMES L. NOWICKI                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1548                                                
                                          Application 10/702,346                                            
                                         Technology Center 3700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 23, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  
            Before TERRY J. OWENS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E. HORNER,                                   
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                   
            HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013