Ex Parte Haff et al - Page 3



            Appeal 2007-1554                                                                                  
            Application 10/844,387                                                                            
                                                THE REJECTION                                                 
                   The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability:                     
                    Robinson                  US 5,915,022              Jun. 22, 1999                         
                    Ginter                    US 6,185,683 B1           Feb. 06, 2001                         
                   The following rejection is before us for review.                                           
                1. The Examiner rejected claims 34-50 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being                         
                   unpatentable over Robinson in view of Ginter.                                              
                                                   ISSUE                                                      
                   A first issue on appeal is whether Appellants have sustained their burden of               
            showing that the Examiner erred in rejecting the rejected claims on appeal as being               
            unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the prior art.                                         
                   According to Appellants, the first issue turns on (1) whether there is a                   
            teaching, suggestion, or motivation to combine Ginter and Robinson, and (2) if so,                
            whether the combination of Ginter and Robinson "teaches" the claimed invention.                   

                                           FINDINGS OF FACT                                                   
                   The following findings of fact are believed to be supported by a                           
            preponderance of the evidence.  To the extent that a finding of fact is a conclusion              
            of law, it may be treated as such.  Additional findings as necessary may appear in                
            the Discussion portion of the opinion.                                                            
                   Robinson discloses a method for providing a digital receipt as a service                   
            offered on the web for a third-party electronic transaction carried out over a public             
            network, the receipt describing details of the electronic transaction so as to                    

                                                      3                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013