Appeal 2007-1554
Application 10/844,387
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Appellants have not sustained their burden on appeal of showing that the
Examiner erred in rejecting the claims on appeal as being unpatentable under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) over the prior art.
Claims 34-50 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the prior art.
On the record before us, Appellants are not entitled to a patent containing
any of the pending claims in the application on appeal.
DECISION
Upon consideration of the record, and for the reasons given, it is
ORDERED that the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 34-50
over the prior art is affirmed.
FURTHER ORDERED that since our application of the references
may be viewed as differing from that of the Examiner, our affirmance and rejection
of objected to and allowed claims are designated as a new rejection. 37 CFR
§ 41.50(b) (2006).
20
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013