Ex Parte Fjare - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1559                                                                             
                Application 10/151,746                                                                       

                      from about 70 to about 50 parts by weight of an unsaturated polyester                  
                having a reactive hydroxyl group content represented by a hydroxyl number                    
                of from about 30 to  about 120 mg KOH/g or resin; and                                        
                      an amount of an organic polyisocyanate sufficient to provide from                      
                about 0.05 to about 0.65 moles of isocyanate groups per mole of said                         
                reactive hydroxyl groups.                                                                    

                      The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence                          
                obviousness:                                                                                 
                Butler     US 5,998,510  Dec. 7, 1999                                                        
                Yamada     JP 56-55247   May 15, 1981                                                        
                      Appellant's claimed invention is directed to a carbon fiber reinforced                 
                composite comprising an ethylenically unsaturated liquid monomer, an                         
                unsaturated polyester having reactive hydroxyl groups, and an amount of                      
                organic polyisocyanate sufficient to provide a molar ratio of isocyanate                     
                groups to hydroxyl groups of from about 0.05 to about 0.65.                                  
                      Appealed claims 12-20 and 27-36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                         
                § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Butler in view of JP '247.1                              
                      Appellant's principal Brief fails to provide separate arguments for any                
                particular claim on appeal.  Accordingly, all the appealed claims stand or fall              
                together with claim 12.  Although Appellant presents separate arguments in                   
                the Reply Brief, it is fundamental that arguments not raised in the main Brief               
                are considered waived.  See Cross Med. Prods., Inc. v. Medtronics Sofamor                    

                                                                                                            
                1  The Examiner's statement of the rejection at page 3 of the Answer                         
                referencing only claim 12-20 is inadvertent, harmless error.  Appellant's                    
                principal Brief acknowledges the § 103 rejection of claims 27-36 as well                     
                (see page 3 of principal Brief).                                                             
                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013