Ex Parte Addiego et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                     Ex parte WILLIAM P. ADDIEGO                                             
                                   and CHARLES M. SORENSEN, JR.                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1564                                                
                                          Application 10/611,508                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 27, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                               
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                         
                decision rejecting claims 1-19.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                
                      We REVERSE.                                                                            








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013