Appeal 2007-1571
Application 10/198,335
made no separate arguments with respect to the patentability of the claims
but, instead, rely on arguments made with respect to independent claims 1,
10, 16, and 20, which arguments we found to be unpersuasive for all of the
reasons discussed supra.
CONCLUSION
In summary, we have sustained the Examiner’s rejections of all the
claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims
1-38 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(effective
September 13, 2004).
AFFIRMED
pgc
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Intellectual Property Administration
P.O. Box 272400
Fort Collins CO 80527-2400
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013