Ex Parte Walls et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte JEFFREY J. WALLS, DONLEY B. HOFFMAN,                                       
                                        and KEVIN T. LEFEBVRE                                                
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1573                                                
                                          Application 10/705,0941                                            
                                          Technology Center 2600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 31, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, JAY P. LUCAS, and JOHN A. JEFFERY,                                   
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s                            
                rejection of claims 44-48, 50, 52-61, and 65.  Claims 49, 51, and 62-64 have                 


                                                                                                            
                1 This application is a continuation of Application No. 10/028,869 filed Dec.                
                21, 2001, now U.S. Pat. 6,683,614.                                                           



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013