The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SHIN-MING LIU, DMITRY MIKULIN, MURALITHARAN VIJAYASUNDARAM and DAVID XINLIANG LI ____________ Appeal 2007-1599 Application 10/255,748 Technology Center 2100 ____________ Decided: September 24, 2007 ____________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of claims 1, 3 to 8, 10 to 13, and 15 to 28. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We will reverse.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013