Ex Parte Agin et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                     
                                        is not binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                     ___________                                                           
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                     ___________                                                           
                            Ex parte PASCAL AGIN and REMI DE MONTGOLFIER                                                   
                                                     ___________                                                           
                                                  Appeal 2007-1603                                                         
                                                Application 10/036,356                                                     
                                               Technology Center 2600                                                      
                                                     ___________                                                           
                                            Decided: September 13, 2007                                                    
                                                     ___________                                                           

                      Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and                                                         
                      ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                      DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                         This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                       
                  Examiner's final rejection of claims 17- 27, 29, 31, 32, 34, 37, 41, and 43-50.                          
                  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                             
                         We AFFIRM.                                                                                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013