The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT E. VAN CLEVE, STEVEN R. DUPREE,
CURTIS R. JONES, and DARREN J. CEPULIS
____________
Appeal 2007-1604
Application 09/966,064
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: July 27, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and JOHN A. JEFFERY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 10, 16, and 17. Claims 2-9, 13-15, and 18-22 have been
indicated as containing allowable subject matter, and claim 1 has been
cancelled (Answer 2). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We
affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013