The opinion in support of the decision being entered
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ORTMUND LANG, BERND RUMPF,
MATTHIAS FRAUENKRON, DIRK FUNHOFF,
THOMAS MANDERBACH, and BERND STEIN
__________
Appeal 2007-1629
Application 10/138,337
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: August 24, 2007
__________
Before ERIC GRIMES, NANCY J. LINCK, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-13
and 17-19. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse.
STATEMENT OF CASE
The claims are directed to processes for the purification of
triethylenediamine (TEDA). Claims 1-13 and 17-19, which are all the
pending claims, are on appeal (Br. 2). The sole rejection on review in this
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013