Appeal 2007-1630
Application 10/422,661
DECISION
Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude that
the Examiner did not err in rejecting claims 1-3, 7-9, and 13-15 under
§ 102(b) for anticipation and claims 4-6, 10-12, and 16-18 under § 103(a) for
obviousness. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-18
is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
rwk
IBM CORPORATION (RHF)
C/O ROBERT H. FRANTZ
P. O. BOX 23324
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73123
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: September 9, 2013