Ex Parte Digan et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                             Ex parte MARY ELLEN DIGAN, PHILIP LAKE,                                         
                                   and RICHARD MICHAEL WRIGHT                                                
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1633                                                
                                          Application 09/480,236                                             
                                          Technology Center 1600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 21, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and ERIC GRIMES,                                   
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                      This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 35-54, the only                      
                claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                    
                § 6(b).                                                                                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013