The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SARAH M. BRANDENBERGER
and DOUGLAS G. KEITHLEY
____________
Appeal 2007-1652
Application 09/776,058
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, LANCE LEONARD BARRY,
and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-20. Claims 21-24 have been indicated as containing
allowable subject matter (Br. 3; Final Rejection 12). We have jurisdiction
under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013