Ex Parte Janakiraman et al - Page 2

              Appeal 2007-1658                                                                     
              Application 09/838,428                                                               

                    Appellants' invention relates to an improved system for presenting             
              multimedia data to users with disabilities.  See Specification, page 1.  Claim       
              1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                 
                    1.  A method for presenting text from moving video to a user, the              
              method comprising:                                                                   
                    receiving multimedia data containing a plurality of moving video               
              frames and an associated plurality of sets of text data, wherein the associated      
              plurality of sets of text data are associated in time with the plurality of          
              moving video frames, wherein the plurality of sets of text data includes a           
              first text data set associated with a first plurality of moving video frames of      
              the multimedia data, and a second text data set associated with a second             
              plurality of moving video frames of the multimedia data;                             
                    extracting the associated plurality of sets of text data from the              
              multimedia data;                                                                     
                    extracting a first video frame, from the first plurality of moving video       
              frames, associated with the first text data set to form a first still image;         
                    extracting a second video frame, from the second plurality of moving           
              video frames, associated with the first1 text data set to form a second still        
              image;                                                                               
                    outputting the first text data set in association with the first still image;  
              and                                                                                  
                    outputting the second text data set in association with the second still       
              image.                                                                               
                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in              
              rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                   
                                                                                                  
              1 Since the second plurality of moving video frames is associated with a             
              second text data set, it appears that this should read "second."  We note that       
              the same inconsistency appears in each of the independent claims.                    

                                                 2                                                 

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013