Ex Parte Kurian et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1669                                                                                
                Application 10/434,038                                                                          

                biological treatment systems.  The process comprises contacting the waste                       
                streams with organic monoamines, organic polyamines and/or ammonium                             
                compounds at essentially ambient conditions (Specification 2-3).                                
                Representative independent claim 1, as presented in the Brief, appears                          
                below:                                                                                          
                       1.  A process for reducing aldehyde and/or ketone concentration in a                     
                non-aqueous waste stream, said process comprising                                               
                       (a) contacting a non-aqueous waste stream comprising at least one                        
                aldehyde and/or at least one ketone with an effective amount of at least one                    
                organic nitrogen-containing base compound selected from the group                               
                consisting of methylamine, ethylamine, dimethylamine, polyamines and                            
                mixtures thereof; and                                                                           
                       (b) maintaining said waste stream in contact with the at least one                       
                organic nitrogen-containing base compounds for a sufficient length of time                      
                to allow at least a 50% reduction in aldehyde and/or ketone concentration.                      

                       The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting the                         
                appealed subject matter:                                                                        
                Lashley   US 3,923,648   Dec. 2, 1975                                                           
                Roof    US 5,606,094   Feb. 25, 1997                                                            
                Kurian   US 6,325,945 B2   Dec. 4, 2001                                                         
                       Claims 1-5, 8-13, 16-22, and 24-26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                        
                § 103 as unpatentable over Kurian in view of Roof; and claims 7 and 15                          
                stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kurian and Roof                       
                in view of Lashley.                                                                             
                The issue presented for review is as follows:                                                   
                       Has the Examiner reasonably determined that a person having                              
                ordinary skill in the art would have been led to perform a process for                          

                                                       2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013