Appeal 2007-1675
Application 10/158,708
col. 1, ll. 16-17 and 25-30). Accordingly, we find no evidence on this record
to support the Examiner’s assertion that Bortz teaches an acrylic polymer or
a material that is capable of being thermoformed, e.g., a thermoplastic.
Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claims 1, 14, 16, 29, 31, and
32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combination of Bortz
and Wimmer.
CONCLUSION
In summary, we reverse all grounds of rejection.
REVERSED
dm
LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP
ATTN: DOCKETING DEPT.
2200 ROSS AVENUE
SUITE 2200
DALLAS TX 75201-6776
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013