Ex Parte Tanigawa et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                              ____________                                                   
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                              ____________                                                   
                      Ex parte FUTOSHI TANIGAWA, YASUSHI NAKAMURA,                                           
                                 KOHJI YUASA, and SO KURANAKA                                                
                                              ____________                                                   
                                            Appeal 2007-1680                                                 
                                         Application 10/081,087                                              
                                         Technology Center 1700                                              
                                              ____________                                                   
                                         Decided:  July 13, 2007                                             
                                              ____________                                                   
              Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                                    
              CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
              PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                    This is an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1                        
              through 4 and 6 through 8, all of the claims pending the above-identified                      
              application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                         








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013