The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN CHU CHEN
____________
Appeal 2007-1067
Application 10/108,793
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 17, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of
claims 1-4, 6, 10-14, and 20-28. The appealed claims have been twice
rejected. Claims 7-9 and 15-19, the only other claims that remain pending in
this application, are withdrawn from further consideration by the Examiner.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013