Ex Parte Bergman - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Ex parte ERIC J. BERGMAN                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1684                                                
                                          Application 10/998,278                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: May 23, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                              
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-4, 7, 8, 10-15,                 
                17, 18, 22, 26, 27, and 34-41.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                     
                      1.  A method for cleaning a workpiece, comprising:                                     
                      placing the workpiece into a chamber;                                                  
                      directly or indirectly heating the workpiece,                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013