Ex Parte Cocco - Page 3



            Appeal No. 2007-1703                                                   Page 3                    
            Application No. 09/729,261                                                                       

                   The invention is an electronic transaction card whose presence can be sensed              
            with an infrared light source.  (Specification 1).  To assure the card’s presence is             
            known to the device, the card is provided with an infrared filtering property.  This             
            is accomplished by, for example, incorporating or embedding a dye in the card                    
            core.  (Specification 5, ll. 2-5, and 9).                                                        
                   All the claims (1-51) are finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being              
            anticipated by Lasch (U.S. Patent No. 6,581,839).                                                

                   A. Issue                                                                                  
                   Appellant contends that Lasch does not anticipate the claimed invention                   
            because it does not describe infrared material embedded in the transaction card                  
            core.  The Examiner disagrees, finding otherwise.  The issue is whether the                      
            Examiner erred in finding Lasch describes infrared material embedded in the                      
            transaction card core.                                                                           

                   B. Facts                                                                                  
                   The record supports the following findings of fact by a preponderance of the              
            evidence.                                                                                        
            1.     The Examiner provides an element-by-element analysis of the claims                        
            showing where in Lasch each claim limitation is described.  (Answer 3-4).                        
            2.     Appellant argues that Lasch fails to describe the element of embedding the                
            infrared filter material “within a supporting substance of said transaction card core            
            and incorporated as an integral part of said card core” as claimed.  (Br. 7).                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013