Appeal 2007-1705
Application 10/508,629
Lastly, we observe that the Responsive Arguments of the Examiner
beginning at page 12 of the Answer have not been challenged or otherwise
traversed by Appellants in the Reply Brief. Moreover, the Reply Brief
merely repeats the same arguments already presented in the principal Brief
on appeal.
In view of the forgoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims
1 through 5, and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. §1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
APJ Initials:
pgc
William S Frommer
Frommer Lawrence & Haug
745 Fifth Avenue
New York NY 10151
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013