Ex Parte Sansone - Page 20



            Appeal 2007-1715                                                     Page 20                     
            Application 10/033,224                                                                           

            2. Customers will contact manufacturers where an item does not meet their                        
            expectations.                                                                                    
            3. Customers will make inquiries if a product does not meet specifications.                      

                   C. Analysis                                                                               
                   Claim 16 is drawn to isolating containers without proper postage and                      
            querying the manufacturer of the article/container about their actual weight if it is            
            different from their weight stored in the database.                                              
            It is generally well known that packages will not be shipped without the                         
            proper postage. Accordingly it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in               
            the art to isolate containers without proper postage until such time they are                    
            provided with the proper postage to ship them.                                                   
                   It is generally well known that customers will contact manufacturers where                
            an item does not meet their expectations and make inquiries if a product does not                
            meet specifications.  Accordingly, it would have been obvious for a shipper to                   
            query a manufacturer about the weight of an article/container to be shipped if their             
            actual weight is determined to be different from their previously-recorded weight                
            stored in a database.                                                                            

                   D. Conclusion of Law                                                                      
                   On the record before us, Appellant has failed to show that the Examiner                   
            erred in rejecting claim 16 over the prior art.                                                  






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013